[Editor’s Note: Occasionally, The Walpolean receives correspondence that addresses a current topic affecting the local community. Robbie Mahrou asked me to share his letter about the Police Station Building. Robbie is a Walpole resident and Independent candidate for Congress in NH-02.]
When I think about our police department in Walpole, I know the right answer. Justin and his team need a new home. I have spent time with him, I understand his dilemma, and frankly, it kills me how we have failed him.
But we also need to understand how we got here.
For four years this project has been kicked around. I have been to a number of the meetings and asked some pretty basic questions. What is our actual crime profile? What do our officers deal with most? Senior fraud, scams, domestic incidents, traffic issues and the everyday problems of a small rural community. Why do we need three holding cells? Are we designing this building around Walpole’s actual needs?
Too often, the answer came back to the grant and federal specifications.
There is nothing wrong with taking grant money. Hell, we should. But the first question should have been, “Justin needs a police station. What does Walpole need that station to be?” Instead, it feels like we started with what the grant would fund and worked backwards.
Now we are looking at a $5 million-plus project and roughly a $30 tax increase per $100,000 of home value. That is a significant burden, and it doesn’t end when construction does. We will own, heat, maintain and repair this building for decades.
So where was the bigger conversation? If we are making a $5 million investment in Walpole, why weren’t we asking what else we could accomplish with that investment? We have an aging population, medical access needs, farmers who desperately need processing capacity, and a future operating budget to consider. Where was the discussion about solar, renewable energy and lowering the lifetime cost of the building?
I am not saying a police station needs to solve every problem in Walpole. It doesn’t. But a $5 million investment should have brought a broader conversation than simply meeting grant specifications.
And there is another issue: local control. If Walpole taxpayers are paying for this facility, we should have a say in what activities take place inside it and what our building, personnel and resources are being used to support. We have to follow the law, but there should be transparency and local oversight before taxpayer-funded resources become part of federal immigration enforcement or other federal operations.
You remember Andy Griffith? Small town, different needs. Walpole is Walpole. We should build for the community we actually have.
I don’t blame Justin. I think we failed him. We waited too long, and now he is trying to solve a problem inside a process that became too expensive and too restrictive.
Justin needs a new home. Walpole taxpayers deserve a responsible investment. Those two things should never have been put at odds with each other.
We can do better. And frankly, we owe it to ourselves to do so.
Robbie Mahrou
Recent Comments